Top Photo: Anti-war
activists demonstrate waterboarding torture during a demo on October 5, 2009 in
front of the White House in Washington, DC.
At a catered breakfast in
downtown D.C. Tuesday, James Mitchell – a contract psychologist who served as
an interrogator and central architect of the CIA’s torture program – advocated
for a return to “some form of legal coercion” for terror suspects.
In 2001, Mitchell, along with a
colleague John “Bruce” Jessen, worked as a psychologist with an Air Force
program designed to help American detainees resist torture tactics. After 9/11,
without any prior
experience conducting interrogations, the two founded a consulting company
that was paid $81
million dollars by the CIA to weaponize those training tactics to
torture CIA detainees.
On Tuesday, Mitchell was promoting
his new book, Enhanced Interrogation: Inside the Minds and Motives of the
Islamic Terrorists Trying to Destroy America, to an audience at the American
Enterprise Institute, a neoconservative think tank. Mitchell’s book
dismisses the widely
held criticism that torture does not work, describing in detail his role in
interrogations, which included slamming prisoners into walls, known as walling,
and waterboarding them.
President Barack Obama banned
those methods in 2009, and Congress followed suit in 2015 by passing a law
limiting interrogation techniques to those listed in the Army field manual.
Mitchell argued that the U.S.
should not necessarily shy away from controversial techniques. “Somewhere
between waterboarding and worse, and what’s in the army field manual, I think
there needs to be some form of legal – let me emphasize that – legal
coercion, to move them along so that you can start using social influence to
get them talking again.”
Mitchell blamed “political
correctness” for condemnation of such techniques, and urged Trump to adopt
harsher methods.
“I would ask president-elect
Trump this: What are you going to do when you have credible evidence of another
pending, catastrophic attack… that could potentially involve nuclear weapons,
and the person you’re interrogating or questioning isn’t responding to the Army
Field Manuel?”
“At some point,” he continued,
“if this obsessive political correctness continues, we’re going to be standing
on the moral high ground, looking down into a smoking hole, that used to be
several blocks in Los Angles.”
Mitchell and Jessen are
currently facing a civil
suit from two former torture victims, and the estate of Gul Rahman – who
was tortured to death in a the CIA prison called the “Salt
Pit.” The American Civil Liberties Union attorneys assisting with the case
say that the executive summary of the Senate Torture Report,
which was released in 2014, provides more than enough evidence
to establish the role of the two men in the CIA torture program.
According to Senate
investigators, Mitchell and Jessen signed an indemnification contract with the
CIA in 2007, in which the CIA agreed pay legal damages for the two men going
forward. At the time the Senate report was released, the agency had already
paid out $1 million.
Despite the prospect of the
civil suit, Mitchell talked openly about waterboarding and walling detainees.
Mitchell asserted his methods were not illegal, because they were
authorized by lawyers who subjected themselves to the same methods.
Mitchell claimed that
he “personally waterboarded an assistant attorney general,” who authorized
the technique just a few days later. “The time to tell me that it wasn’t
torture was when that attorney general got off of the waterboard,” said
Mitchell.
Acting assistant attorney
General Daniel Levin requested in 2004 that he experience waterboarding
firsthand before he opined on its legality, ABC News reported three
years later. He was later forced out of the Department of Justice while
authoring a memo that would have imposed tighter controls on torture
techniques.
Mitchell, for his part, joked
that he wouldn’t mind waterboarding more lawyers. “I waterboarded almost as
many lawyers as I did terrorists,” he said. “I’m one down.”
The line was met with laughter.
In his book Pay Any Price,
New York Times Journalist James Risen documents how the American Psychological
Association quietly revised its
ethics rules in 2002 to allow certified psychologists to work with the
torture program. Emails
obtained by the Intercept in April 2015 show that the CIA and APA had a close
relationship, even cohosting a conference in 2003 titled “The Science of
Deception.”
Mitchell called the accusations
of collusion between the APA and the CIA “poppycock,” and “crap.” Speaking
about the APA, who has since condemned
Mitchell’s action, Mitchell said “those people are not part of my life. I don’t
care what they think.”
Sarah Dougherty, a senior
fellow with Physicians for Human Rights, argued that it was inexcusable for
Mitchell to go on a public relations tour.
“Mitchell admits he ‘uses
psychology as a weapon against those sent to destroy us to get intelligence,’”
said Dougherty. “What he conveniently omits is that weaponizing psychology to
undermine and harm people is a profoundly unethical application of those
skills.”
“Health professionals have
ethics for a reason,” she said. “He knowingly violated them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment