WASHINGTON ― Glenn Beck’s
website The Blaze is coming apart, suffering from a lack of editorial
direction, staff attrition and internal discord, according to sources inside
the news outlet.
The site, which Beck launched
in 2010 to serve as the conservative counterpart to The Huffington Post, has
dropped from 25 employees on its editorial side to just six. A source inside
The Blaze, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution, told HuffPost that
the mood among the rapidly diminishing news team is somber.
“The few people who are still
left are looking for an exit because they know The Blaze is over,” the source
said. “They haven’t told us straight up that they’re done with us, but all the
signs point to it, and they’re not replacing people who are laid off or get
out.”
Other sources at the site say
that reporters were notified in September that their phone and travel stipends
had been eliminated. They were also notified over the summer that their health
benefits would be reduced.
The
Blaze officially closed its New York newsroom, a 35,000-square-foot space in
Manhattan, in June. The remaining employees are working from their homes.
It is a remarkable crash for a
news site that started with tons of promise. Beck launched The Blaze six years
ago as an expansion of his empire, which already included radio, television and
book publishing. He described it as a place where readers could come to find original
reporting and stories that the mainstream media overlooked. It was known for
plundering the web for local news stories that would appeal to conservatives
and drive huge traffic, such as “8-Year-Old Florida Boy Suspended For Making
Gun Shape With Fingers.”
The Blaze’s traffic quickly became a subject
of envy for other conservative outlets. [A defect of Democracy.] While
popular sites like Breitbart News and the Daily Caller rely heavily on referral
traffic from the Drudge Report to boost their page views, The Blaze was able to
gain huge traffic despite rarely getting Drudge links. The Blaze attracted 31.6
million unique visitors in October 2014, according to the analytics site
Quantcast. By this September, however, its traffic had plummeted to 7.8 million
unique visitors.
In conversations with more than
half a dozen former and current employees of The Blaze, all blamed upper-level
management for the site’s troubles. There have been four CEOs since 2010, and
two of them left in a span of six months in 2015. Beck is currently embroiled
in a lawsuit with one of those former CEOs, whom he has accused of fraud and
mismanagement.
“We had everything when we
started in 2010 ― a huge platform and following ― but management screwed it up
with their incompetence,” one source told HuffPost. “They made so many stupid
mistakes, and Glenn trusts the wrong people, who then go and hire other bad
people.”
But sources inside the
publication remain highly skeptical.
“Padveen has a history of telling everyone
that everything is fine, then a few days later calling people and directing
them to fire people because The Blaze can’t make payroll,” said one source.
[Saved.] Another, who is familiar with the “Blaze 2.0” plan, told
HuffPost that management has been talking about relaunching for more than a
year, and that those plans would likely move the site away from actual news.
“When The Blaze launched, Glenn
said that it would be a place for reported pieces and news, but the ‘Blaze 2.0’
relaunch will be sponsored content, community-generated content, and links to
videos from Glenn Beck’s Blaze TV shows,” the source said. “The Blaze as we
know it is dead.”
While reports of The Blaze’s
downfall began in early 2016, the tensions between the editorial team and
Beck’s appointed management team truly came to a head in April, over a story
posted by Deputy Managing Editor Oliver Darcy. The story concerned a hot mic
moment from conservative radio host Laura Ingraham, in which she said the word
“fuck,” thinking her microphone was dead.
Sources within The Blaze said
that Ingraham reached out to the site’s management, angry that they allowed
their reporters to write about the incident. Management apologized to Ingraham,
the sources said, and Padveen had the post quietly removed from the website without
notifying the editors.
Darcy soon realized that the
post, which had been the top story on the site, had been changed to a private
setting and was no longer accessible to readers. Sources familiar with the
incident said Darcy reached out to management to find out what happened. He did
not receive a reply, so he reposted the article.
Padveen, realizing the post had
been made public once again, threatened to fire Darcy unless he took it down.
Darcy refused, prompting Padveen to contact someone in the Blaze’s tech
department to have it removed. According to multiple sources, reporters in the
newsroom were ready to leave The Blaze if management didn’t put the piece back
up. Padveen, fearful of a mass employee exodus, caved and republished the piece
with a modified headline and a note claiming: “This story was mistakenly
deleted following publication.”
Darcy didn’t respond to
requests for comment. The Blaze’s public relations firm didn’t respond to
questions about the article.
“For many of us, that incident
was just too much, especially because we were told that The Blaze was supposed
to be a real news website,” said one source. “Management is so disconnected
from their reporters and editors, and here they were trying to override a
decision in order to make Laura Ingraham happy without even consulting the
people who actually write and edit the website.”
No comments:
Post a Comment