Former Gov. Martin O’Malley, D-Md., now positioning
himself as a progressive populist among potential 2016 presidential candidates,
told
USA Today that he differs from Hillary Clinton because he
opposes the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade agreement he said will “hollow
out our middle class and middle class wages.”
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, is a proposed
free trade accord between the U.S. and 11 Pacific Rim countries. Critics
say the deal will provide corporate interests with sweeping powers to challenge
banking and environmental regulations and other rules in
special courts set up under the World Bank, and they argue the TPP will hurt American jobs by
extending the ability of businesses to relocate facilities to countries
involved in the agreement.
But just two years ago, there was no criticism to be
heard when O’Malley discussed the TPP.
On May 8, 2013, O’Malley spoke before
a trade conference hosted by the Council of Americas in Washington, D.C.,
where he was asked on camera about his perspective as a governor on the TPP and
other trade deals pursued by the Obama administration. “I would hazard to guess
that a majority of us [governors] believe that free trade, provided it’s fair —
and that’s always the rub — is a net benefit for us. I believe that, at the
risk of stating the painfully obvious, we’re all part of a global economy,”
O’Malley said. “So it would seem to me, that to the extent that we can be proactive
in concluding agreements with strategic partners, geographically,
philosophically, then that is a benefit to us.”
Watch O’Malley’s comments below:
No comments:
Post a Comment