Scarlett Johansson has said she stands by her
decision to appear in an advertising campaign for the Israeli-based soft drinks
company SodaStream, which has a factory in a settlement on West Bank.
Johansson denied her deal with the brand – which led
to her quitting as an ambassador for Oxfam – was a mistake.
She said: “No, I stand behind
that decision,” adding, in an interview with the Observer: “I was aware of that
particular factory before I signed. And it still doesn’t seem like a problem –
at least not until someone comes up with a solution to the closing of that
factory and leaving all those people destitute.”
Johansson quit her role as an ambassador for Oxfam in January after
working with the charity for eight years.
At the time, Oxfam had come under fire from pro-Palestinian
campaigners over the placement of SodaStream’s factory, as the charity
considers Israeli settlements on the West Bank to be illegal.
Oxfam
had written to Johansson to explain that while the celebrities who volunteer to
help the charity are independent, as an organisation it officially “believes
that businesses that operate in settlements further the ongoing poverty and
denial of rights of the Palestinian communities that we work to support”.
Johansson said she now understands that British
opinion on the status of the West Bank is more clear cut than she has found
elsewhere, but the fact that the UN, the Red Cross and the International Court
of Justice have all agreed the factory clashes with international law, has not
changed her mind on the issue.
She said the case against the factory was not clear, and
something that is “very easily debatable”.
“In that case… I was
literally plunged into a conversation that’s way grander and larger than that
particular issue. And there’s no right side or wrong side leaning on this
issue,” she added.
Johansson also alleged that Oxfam had supported and
funded a BDS (boycott, divest, sanctions) movement, which the charity denies.
She said: “I think for a non-governmental
organisation to be supporting something that’s a political cause… something feels
not right about that to me. There’s plenty of evidence that Oxfam does support and
has funded a BDS movement in the past. It’s something that can’t really be
denied.”
The ad campaign for SodaStream that caused the furore
was due to be shown during the Super Bowl ad break earlier this year, but was
banned by broadcaster Fox for the inclusion of the line: “Sorry, Coke and
Pepsi”.
The campaign aimed to promote SodaStream as an ethical
soft-drinks company as it does not use plastic bottles, unlike Coca-Cola and
Pepsi.
No comments:
Post a Comment