Excerpts from Hillary Clinton’s
closed-door paid speeches, including to financial firms, appeared to be made
public for the first time on Friday when WikiLeaks published hundreds of hacked
emails from her campaign chairman.
The speech transcripts, a major
subject of contention during the Democratic primary, include quotes from
Clinton about her distance from middle-class life (“I’m kind of far removed”);
her vision of strategic governing (“you need both a public and a private
position”); and her views on trade, health care, and Wall Street (“even if it
may not be 100 percent true, if the perception is that somehow the game is
rigged.”)
John Podesta, the Clinton
campaign chairman, was the latest victim in a wave of hacks on key figures in
Democratic politics and the political establishment in what administration
officials say is an effort by Russia to undermine the election.
Clinton research director Tony
Carrk sent the excerpts in an email to Podesta
and other senior aides, sourcing the “the flags from HRC’s paid speeches” to
the Harry Walker Agency, the firm that represented Clinton and arranged her
dozens of public and private paid speech deals after she left the State
Department in early 2013.
The email is dated Jan. 25,
2016, with the subject line, “HRC Paid Speeches.”
Carrk identified and sent the
“highlights” in the email, telling Podesta and Clinton’s communications
director, Jennifer Palmieri, that there were “a lot of policy positions that we
should give an extra scrub” with the campaign’s policy department.
Clinton spokesman Glen Caplin
said the campaign would not be confirming the authenticity of any of the emails
made public on Friday. But administration officials, he said, have “removed
any reasonable doubt that the Kremlin has weaponized WikiLeaks to meddle in our
election and benefit Donald Trump’s candidacy.”
U.S. officials have also warned
that Russia could be “doctoring”
hacked emails, including those stolen this summer from the Democratic National
Committee.
During this year’s long-fought
Democratic primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders repeatedly pressed Clinton to release
the transcripts of the speeches, which were delivered to a variety of groups,
including major firms like Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank.
Late last year, Clinton said
she would “look
into” releasing the transcripts. She never did, arguing that Republicans
and others should also release theirs. “Let everybody who’s ever given a speech
to any private group under any circumstances release them,” she told ABC this
February. “We’ll all release them at the same time.”
Late into the primary, Sanders
argued that the American people had a right to know what Clinton told
well-heeled audiences on Wall Street about her economic policy.
“We all rely on the market’s
transparency and integrity. So even if it may not be 100 percent true, if the
perception is that somehow the game is rigged, that should be a problem for all
of us, and we have to be willing to make that absolutely clear,” Clinton said
in one apparent excerpt, softening an assertion she has made frequently on the
trail, that “the economy is rigged in favor of those at the top.”
In the same remarks, attributed
to a 2014 speech to Deutsche Bank, Clinton also said that much of financial
reform “really has to come from the industry itself.”
The flagged excerpts don’t
provide context for Clinton’s remarks, but include several comments in which
she appears to express strong pro-trade sentiments.
“My dream is a hemispheric
common market, with open trade and open borders,” Clinton is quoted as telling
a Brazilian bank in 2013. “We have to resist, protectionism, other kinds of
barriers to market access and to trade.”
Clinton opposes the
Trans-Pacific Partnership, but has faced criticism from both Sanders and Trump
for adopting what they charge is a politically convenient stance.
The apparent speech transcripts
have spilled out into the public as young voters and progressives, including
those who flocked to Sanders’ campaign, still have questions about Clinton and
may turn to a third-party candidate in the fall.
In one excerpt identified as
part of a speech to the Xerox company in March 2014, Clinton talked about the
need for “two sensible, moderate, pragmatic parties.”
Read the full email below:
From: Tony Carrk
To: Jennifer Palmieri, John Podesta, [Chief of Staff to the Chairman] Sara Latham, [Deputy Communications Director] Kristina Schake, [Deputy Communications Director] Christina Reynolds, [National Press Secretary] Brian Fallon
Date: Jan. 25, 2016
Subject: HRC Paid Speeches
Team,
Attached are the flags from
HRC’s paid speeches we have from HWA. I put some highlights below. There is a
lot of policy positions that we should give an extra scrub with Policy.
In terms of what was opened to
the press and what was not, the Washington Examiner got a hold of one of the
private speech contracts (her speeches to universities were typically open
press), so this is worth a read
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clintons-speeches-are-cozy-for-wall-streeters-but-closed-to-journalists/article/2553294/section/author/dan-friedman
*CLINTON ADMITS SHE IS OUT
OF TOUCH*
*Hillary Clinton: “I’m Kind Of
Far Removed” From The Struggles Of The Middle Class “Because The Life I’ve
Lived And The Economic, You Know, Fortunes That My Husband And I Now Enjoy.”*
“And I am not taking a position
on any policy, but I do think there is a growing sense of anxiety and even
anger in the country over the feeling that the game is rigged. And I never had
that feeling when I was growing up. Never. I mean, were there really rich
people, of course there were. My father loved to complain about big business
and big government, but we had a solid middle class upbringing. We had good
public schools. We had accessible health care. We had our little, you know,
one-family house that, you know, he saved up his money, didn’t believe in
mortgages. So I lived that. And now, obviously, I’m kind of far removed because
the life I’ve lived and the economic, you know, fortunes that my husband and I
now enjoy, but I haven’t forgotten it.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks at
Goldman-Black Rock, 2/4/14]
*CLINTON SAYS YOU NEED TO
HAVE A PRIVATE AND PUBLIC POSITION ON POLICY*
*Clinton: “But If Everybody’s
Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know,
Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public
And A Private Position.”*
CLINTON: You just have to sort
of figure out how to — getting back to that word, “balance” — how to balance
the public and the private efforts that are necessary to be successful,
politically, and that’s not just a comment about today. That, I think, has
probably been true for all of our history, and if you saw the Spielberg movie,
Lincoln, and how he was maneuvering and working to get the 13th Amendment
passed, and he called one of my favorite predecessors, Secretary Seward, who
had been the governor and senator from New York, ran against Lincoln for
president, and he told Seward, I need your help to get this done. And Seward
called some of his lobbyist friends who knew how to make a deal, and they just
kept going at it. I mean, politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory,
and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But
if everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the
deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you
need both a public and a private position. And finally, I think — I believe in
evidence-based decision making. I want to know what the facts are. I mean, it’s
like when you guys go into some kind of a deal, you know, are you going to do
that development or not, are you going to do that renovation or not, you know,
you look at the numbers. You try to figure out what’s going to work and what’s
not going to work. [Clinton Speech For National Multi-Housing Council, 4/24/13]
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT HOLDING
WALL STREET ACCOUNTABLE ONLY FOR POLITICAL REASONS*
*Clinton Said That The Blame
Placed On The United States Banking System For The Crisis “Could Have Been
Avoided In Terms Of Both Misunderstanding And Really Politicizing What
Happened.”*
“That was one of the reasons
that I started traveling in February of ‘09, so people could, you know,
literally yell at me for the United States and our banking system causing this
everywhere. Now, that’s an oversimplification we know, but it was the
conventional wisdom. And I think that there’s a lot that could have been
avoided in terms of both misunderstanding and really politicizing what happened
with greater transparency, with greater openness on all sides, you know, what
happened, how did it happen, how do we prevent it from happening? You guys help
us figure it out and let’s make sure that we do it right this time. And I think
that everybody was desperately trying to fend off the worst effects
institutionally, governmentally, and there just wasn’t that opportunity to try
to sort this out, and that came later.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative
Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
*Clinton: “Even If It May Not
Be 100 Percent True, If The Perception Is That Somehow The Game Is Rigged, That
Should Be A Problem For All Of Us.” *
“Now, it’s important to
recognize the vital role that the financial markets play in our economy and
that so many of you are contributing to. To function effectively those markets
and the men and women who shape them have to command trust and confidence,
because we all rely on the market’s transparency and integrity. So even if it
may not be 100 percent true, if the perception is that somehow the game is
rigged, that should be a problem for all of us, and we have to be willing to
make that absolutely clear. And if there are issues, if there’s wrongdoing,
people have to be held accountable and we have to try to deter future bad
behavior, because the public trust is at the core of both a free market economy
and a democracy.” [Clinton Remarks to Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14]
*CLINTON SUGGESTS WALL
STREET INSIDERS ARE WHAT IS NEEDED TO FIX WALL STREET*
*Clinton Said Financial Reform
“Really Has To Come From The Industry Itself.” *
“Remember what Teddy Roosevelt
did. Yes, he took on what he saw as the excesses in the economy, but he also
stood against the excesses in politics. He didn’t want to unleash a lot of
nationalist, populistic reaction. He wanted to try to figure out how to get
back into that balance that has served America so well over our entire
nationhood. Today, there’s more that can and should be done that really has to
come from the industry itself, and how we can strengthen our economy, create
more jobs at a time where that’s increasingly challenging, to get back to Teddy
Roosevelt’s square deal. And I really believe that our country and all of you
are up to that job.” [Clinton Remarks to Deutsche Bank, 10/7/14]
*Speaking About The Importance
Of Proper Regulation, Clinton Said “The People That Know The Industry Better
Than Anybody Are The People Who Work In The Industry.”*
“I mean, it’s still happening,
as you know. People are looking back and trying to, you know, get compensation
for bad mortgages and all the rest of it in some of the agreements that are
being reached. There’s nothing magic about regulations, too much is bad, too
little is bad. How do you get to the golden key, how do we figure out what
works? And the people that know the industry better than anybody are the people
who work in the industry. And I think there has to be a recognition that, you
know, there’s so much at stake now, I mean, the business has changed so much
and decisions are made so quickly, in nano seconds basically. We spend
trillions of dollars to travel around the world, but it’s in everybody’s
interest that we have a better framework, and not just for the United States
but for the entire world, in which to operate and trade.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS
Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
*CLINTON ADMITS NEEDING WALL
STREET FUNDING*
*Clinton Said That Because
Candidates Needed Money From Wall Street To Run For Office, People In New York
Needed To Ask Tough Questions About The Economy Before Handing Over Campaign
Contributions. *
“Secondly, running for office
in our country takes a lot of money, and candidates have to go out and raise
it. New York is probably the leading site for contributions for fundraising for
candidates on both sides of the aisle, and it’s also our economic center. And
there are a lot of people here who should ask some tough questions before
handing over campaign contributions to people who were really playing chicken
with our whole economy.” [Goldman Sachs AIMS Alternative Investments Symposium,
10/24/13]
*Clinton: “It Would Be Very Difficult
To Run For President Without Raising A Huge Amount Of Money And Without Having
Other People Supporting You Because Your Opponent Will Have Their Supporters.”*
“So our system is, in many
ways, more difficult, certainly far more expensive and much longer than a
parliamentary system, and I really admire the people who subject themselves to
it. Even when I, you know, think they should not be elected president, I still
think, well, you know, good for you I guess, you’re out there promoting
democracy and those crazy ideas of yours. So I think that it’s something — I
would like — you know, obviously as somebody who has been through it, I would
like it not to last as long because I think it’s very distracting from what we
should be doing every day in our public business. I would like it not to be so
expensive. I have no idea how you do that. I mean, in my campaign — I lose
track, but I think I raised $250 million or some such enormous amount, and in
the last campaign President Obama raised 1.1 billion, and that was before the
Super PACs and all of this other money just rushing in, and it’s so ridiculous
that we have this kind of free for all with all of this financial interest at
stake, but, you know, the Supreme Court said that’s basically what we’re in for.
So we’re kind of in the wild west, and, you know, it would be very difficult to
run for president without raising a huge amount of money and without having
other people supporting you because your opponent will have their supporters.
So I think as hard as it was when I ran, I think it’s even harder now.”
[Clinton Speech For General Electric’s Global Leadership Meeting – Boca Raton,
FL, 1/6/14]
*CLINTON TOUTS HER
RELATIONSHIP TO WALL STREET AS A SENATOR*
*Clinton: As Senator, “I
Represented And Worked With” So Many On Wall Street And “Did All I Could To
Make Sure They Continued To Prosper” But Still Called For Closing Carried
Interest Loophole.*
In remarks at Robbins, Gellar,
Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, Hillary Clinton said, “When I was a Senator
from New York, I represented and worked with so many talented principled people
who made their living in finance. But even thought I represented them and did
all I could to make sure they continued to prosper, I called for closing the
carried interest loophole and addressing skyrocketing CEO pay. I also was
calling in ‘06, ‘07 for doing something about the mortgage crisis, because I
saw every day from Wall Street literally to main streets across New York how a
well-functioning financial system is essential. So when I raised early warnings
about early warnings about subprime mortgages and called for regulating
derivatives and over complex financial products, I didn’t get some big
arguments, because people sort of said, no, that makes sense. But boy, have we
had fights about it ever since.” [Hillary Clinton’s Remarks at Robbins Geller
Rudman & Dowd in San Diego, 9/04/14]
*Clinton On Wall Street: “I Had
Great Relations And Worked So Close Together After 9/11 To Rebuild Downtown,
And A Lot Of Respect For The Work You Do And The People Who Do It.”
*“Now, without going over how
we got to where we are right now, what would be your advice to the Wall Street
community and the big banks as to the way forward with those two important
decisions? SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I represented all of you for eight years. I
had great relations and worked so close together after 9/11 to rebuild
downtown, and a lot of respect for the work you do and the people who do it,
but I do — I think that when we talk about the regulators and the politicians,
the economic consequences of bad decisions back in ‘08, you know, were
devastating, and they had repercussions throughout the world.” [Goldman Sachs
AIMS Alternative Investments Symposium, 10/24/13]
*CLINTON TALKS ABOUT THE
CHALLENGES RUNNING FOR OFFICE*
*Hillary Clinton Said There Was
“A Bias Against People Who Have Led Successful And/Or Complicated Lives,”
Citing The Need To Divese Of Assets, Positions, And Stocks.*
“SECRETARY CLINTON: Yeah. Well,
you know what Bob Rubin said about that. He said, you know, when he came to
Washington, he had a fortune. And when he left Washington, he had a small —
MR. BLANKFEIN: That’s how you
have a small fortune, is you go to Washington.
SECRETARY CLINTON: You go to
Washington. Right. But, you know, part of the problem with the political
situation, too, is that there is such a bias against people who have led
successful and/or complicated lives. You know, the divestment of assets, the
stripping of all kinds of positions, the sale of stocks. It just becomes very
onerous and unnecessary.” [Goldman Sachs Builders And Innovators Summit,
10/29/13]
*CLINTON SUGGESTS SHE IS A
MODERATE*
*Clinton Said That Both The
Democratic And Republican Parties Should Be “Moderate.” *
“URSULA BURNS: Interesting.
Democrats?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Oh, long,
definitely.
URSULA BURNS: Republicans?
SECRETARY CLINTON:
Unfortunately, at the time, short.
URSULA BURNS: Okay. We’ll go
back to questions.
SECRETARY CLINTON: We need two
parties.
URSULA BURNS: Yeah, we do need
two parties.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Two
sensible, moderate, pragmatic parties.” [Hillary Clinton Remarks, Remarks at
Xerox, 3/18/14]
*Clinton: “Simpson-Bowles… Put
Forth The Right Framework. Namely, We Have To Restrain Spending, We Have To
Have Adequate Revenues, And We Have To Incentivize Growth. It’s A Three-Part
Formula… And They Reached An Agreement. But What Is Very Hard To Do Is To Then
Take That Agreement If You Don’t Believe That You’re Going To Be Able To Move
The Other Side.”*
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, this
may be borne more out of hope than experience in the last few years. But
Simpson-Bowles — and I know you heard from Erskine earlier today — put forth
the right framework. Namely, we have to restrain spending, we have to have adequate
revenues, and we have to incentivize growth. It’s a three-part formula. The
specifics can be negotiated depending upon whether we’re acting in good faith
or not. And what Senator Simpson and Erskine did was to bring Republicans and
Democrats alike to the table, and you had the full range of ideological views
from I think Tom Coburn to Dick Durbin. And they reached an agreement. But what
is very hard to do is to then take that agreement if you don’t believe that
you’re going to be able to move the other side. And where we are now is in this
gridlocked dysfunction. So you’ve got Democrats saying that, you know, you have
to have more revenues; that’s the sine qua non of any kind of agreement. You
have Republicans saying no, no, no on revenues; you have to cut much more
deeply into spending. Well, looks what’s happened. We are slowly returning to
growth. It’s not as much or as fast as many of us would like to see, but, you
know, we’re certainly better off than our European friends, and we’re beginning
to, I believe, kind of come out of the long aftermath of the ‘08 crisis.
[Clinton Speech For Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
*Clinton: “The Simpson-Bowles
Framework And The Big Elements Of It Were Right… You Have To Restrain Spending,
You Have To Have Adequate Revenues, And You Have To Have Growth.”*
CLINTON: So, you know, the
Simpson-Bowles framework and the big elements of it were right. The specifics
can be negotiated and argued over. But you got to do all three. You have to
restrain spending, you have to have adequate revenues, and you have to have
growth. And I think we are smart enough to figure out how to do that. [Clinton
Speech For Morgan Stanley, 4/18/13]
*CLINTON IS AWARE OF
SECURITY CONCERNS AROUND BLACKBERRIES*
*Clinton: “At The State
Department We Were Attacked Every Hour, More Than Once An Hour By Incoming
Efforts To Penetrate Everything We Had. And That Was True Across The U.S.
Government.”*
CLINTON: But, at the State
Department we were attacked every hour, more than once an hour by incoming
efforts to penetrate everything we had. And that was true across the U.S.
government. And we knew it was going on when I would go to China, or I would go
to Russia, we would leave all of our electronic equipment on the plane, with
the batteries out, because this is a new frontier. And they’re trying to find
out not just about what we do in our government. They’re trying to find out
about what a lot of companies do and they were going after the personal emails
of people who worked in the State Department. So it’s not like the only
government in the world that is doing anything is the United States. But, the
United States compared to a number of our competitors is the only government in
the world with any kind of safeguards, any kind of checks and balances. They
may in many respects need to be strengthened and people need to be reassured,
and they need to have their protections embodied in law. But, I think turning
over a lot of that material intentionally or unintentionally, because of the
way it can be drained, gave all kinds of information not only to big countries,
but to networks and terrorist groups, and the like. So I have a hard time
thinking that somebody who is a champion of privacy and liberty has taken
refuge in Russia under Putin’s authority. And then he calls into a Putin talk
show and says, President Putin, do you spy on people? And President Putin says,
well, from one intelligence professional to another, of course not. Oh, thank
you so much. I mean, really, I don’t know. I have a hard time following it. [Clinton
Speech At UConn, 4/23/14]
*Hillary Clinton: “When I Got
To The State Department, It Was Still Against The Rules To Let Most — Or Let
All Foreign Service Officers Have Access To A Blackberry.” *
“I mean, let’s face it, our
government is woefully, woefully behind in all of its policies that affect the
use of technology. When I got to the State Department, it was still against the
rules to let most — or let all Foreign Service Officers have access to a
Blackberry. You couldn’t have desktop computers when Colin Powell was there.
Everything that you are taking advantage of, inventing and using, is still a
generation or two behind when it comes to our government.” [Hillary Clinton
Remarks at Nexenta, 8/28/14]
*Hillary Clinton: “We Couldn’t
Take Our Computers, We Couldn’t Take Our Personal Devices” Off The Plane In
China And Russia. *
“I mean, probably the most
frustrating part of this whole debate are countries acting like we’re the only
people in the world trying to figure out what’s going on. I mean, every time I
went to countries like China or Russia, I mean, we couldn’t take our computers,
we couldn’t take our personal devices, we couldn’t take anything off the plane
because they’re so good, they would penetrate them in a minute, less, a
nanosecond. So we would take the batteries out, we’d leave them on the plane.”
[Hillary Clinton Remarks at Nexenta, 8/28/14]
*Clinton Said When She Got To
State, Employees “Were Not Mostly Permitted To Have Handheld Devices.”*
“You know, when Colin Powell
showed up as Secretary of State in 2001, most State Department employees still
didn’t even have computers on their desks. When I got there they were not
mostly permitted to have handheld devices. I mean, so you’re thinking how do we
operate in this new environment dominated by technology, globalizing forces? We
have to change, and I can’t expect people to change if I don’t try to model it
and lead it.” [Clinton Speech For General Electric’s Global Leadership Meeting
– Boca Raton, FL, 1/6/14]
*Hillary Clinton Said You Know You
Can’t Bring Your Phone And Computer When Traveling To China And Russia And She
Had To Take Her Batteries Out And Put them In A Special Box. *
“And anybody who has ever
traveled in other countries, some of which shall remain nameless, except for
Russia and China, you know that you can’t bring your phones and your computers.
And if you do, good luck. I mean, we would not only take the batteries out, we
would leave the batteries and the devices on the plane in special boxes. Now,
we didn’t do that because we thought it would be fun to tell somebody about. We
did it because we knew that we were all targets and that we would be totally
vulnerable. So it’s not only what others do to us and what we do to them and
how many people are involved in it. It’s what’s the purpose of it, what is
being collected, and how can it be used. And there are clearly people in this
room who know a lot about this, and some of you could be very useful
contributors to that conversation because you’re sophisticated enough to know
that it’s not just, do it, don’t do it. We have to have a way of doing it, and
then we have to have a way of analyzing it, and then we have to have a way of
sharing it.” [Goldman Sachs Builders And Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
*Hillary Clinton Lamented How
Far Behind The State Department Was In Technology, Saying “People Were Not Even
Allowed To Use Mobile Devices Because Of Security Issues.” *
“Personally, having, you know,
lived and worked in the White House, having been a senator, having been
Secretary of State, there has traditionally been a great pool of very talented,
hard-working people. And just as I was saying about the credit market, our
personnel policies haven’t kept up with the changes necessary in government. We
have a lot of difficulties in getting—when I got to the State Department, we
were so far behind in technology, it was embarrassing. And, you know, people
were not even allowed to use mobile devices because of security issues and cost
issues, and we really had to try to push into the last part of the 20th Century
in order to get people functioning in 2009 and ‘10.” [Goldman Sachs Builders
And Innovators Summit, 10/29/13]
*CLINTON REMARKS ARE PRO
KEYSTONE AND PRO TRADE*
*Clinton: “So I Think That
Keystone Is A Contentious Issue, And Of Course It Is Important On Both Sides Of
The Border For Different And Sometimes Opposing Reasons…” *
“So I think that Keystone is a
contentious issue, and of course it is important on both sides of the border
for different and sometimes opposing reasons, but that is not our relationship.
And I think our relationship will get deeper and stronger and put us in a
position to really be global leaders in energy and climate change if we worked
more closely together. And that’s what I would like to see us do.” [Remarks at tinePublic,
6/18/14]
*Hillary Clinton Said Her Dream
Is A Hemispheric Common Market, With Open Trade And Open Markets. *
“My dream is a hemispheric
common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with
energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and
opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco
Itau.doc, p. 28]
*Hillary Clinton Said We Have
To Have A Concerted Plan To Increase Trade; We Have To Resist Protectionism And
Other Kinds Of Barriers To Trade.
*“Secondly, I think we have to
have a concerted plan to increase trade already under the current
circumstances, you know, that Inter-American Development Bank figure is pretty
surprising. There is so much more we can do, there is a lot of low hanging
fruit but businesses on both sides have to make it a priority and it’s not for
governments to do but governments can either make it easy or make it hard and
we have to resist, protectionism, other kinds of barriers to market access and
to trade and I would like to see this get much more attention and be not just a
policy for a year under president X or president Y but a consistent one.”
[05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 32]
*CLINTON IS MORE FAVORABLE
TO CANADIAN HEALTH CARE AND SINGLE PAYER*
*Clinton Said Single-Payer
Health Care Systems “Can Get Costs Down,” And “Is As Good Or Better On Primary
Care,” But “They Do Impose Things Like Waiting Times.” *
“If you look at countries that
are comparable, like Switzerland or Germany, for example, they have mixed
systems. They don’t have just a single-payer system, but they have very clear
controls over budgeting and accountability. If you look at the single-payer
systems, like Scandinavia, Canada, and elsewhere, they can get costs down because,
you know, although their care, according to statistics, overall is as good or
better on primary care, in particular, they do impose things like waiting
times, you know. It takes longer to get like a hip replacement than it might
take here.” [Hillary Clinton remarks to ECGR Grand Rapids, 6/17/13]
*Clinton Cited President
Johnson’s Success In Establishing Medicare And Medicaid And Said She Wanted To
See The U.S. Have Universal Health Care Like In Canada.*
“You know, on healthcare we are
the prisoner of our past. The way we got to develop any kind of medical
insurance program was during World War II when companies facing shortages of
workers began to offer healthcare benefits as an inducement for employment. So
from the early 1940s healthcare was seen as a privilege connected to
employment. And after the war when soldiers came back and went back into the
market there was a lot of competition, because the economy was so heated up. So
that model continued. And then of course our large labor unions bargained for
healthcare with the employers that their members worked for. So from the early
1940s until the early 1960s we did not have any Medicare, or our program for
the poor called Medicaid until President Johnson was able to get both passed in
1965. So the employer model continued as the primary means by which working
people got health insurance. People over 65 were eligible for Medicare.
Medicaid, which was a partnership, a funding partnership between the federal
government and state governments, provided some, but by no means all poor
people with access to healthcare. So what we’ve been struggling with certainly
Harry Truman, then Johnson was successful on Medicare and Medicaid, but didn’t
touch the employer based system, then actually Richard Nixon made a proposal
that didn’t go anywhere, but was quite far reaching. Then with my husband’s
administration we worked very hard to come up with a system, but we were very
much constricted by the political realities that if you had your insurance from
your employer you were reluctant to try anything else. And so we were trying to
build a universal system around the employer-based system. And indeed now with
President Obama’s legislative success in getting the Affordable Care Act passed
that is what we’ve done. We still have primarily an employer-based system, but
we now have people able to get subsidized insurance. So we have health
insurance companies playing a major role in the provision of healthcare, both
to the employed whose employers provide health insurance, and to those who are
working but on their own are not able to afford it and their employers either
don’t provide it, or don’t provide it at an affordable price. We are still
struggling. We’ve made a lot of progress. Ten million Americans now have
insurance who didn’t have it before the Affordable Care Act, and that is a
great step forward. (Applause.) And what we’re going to have to continue to do
is monitor what the costs are and watch closely to see whether employers drop
more people from insurance so that they go into what we call the health
exchange system. So we’re really just at the beginning. But we do have Medicare
for people over 65. And you couldn’t, I don’t think, take it away if you tried,
because people are very satisfied with it, but we also have a lot of political
and financial resistance to expanding that system to more people. So we’re in a
learning period as we move forward with the implementation of the Affordable
Care Act. And I’m hoping that whatever the shortfalls or the glitches have been,
which in a big piece of legislation you’re going to have, those will be
remedied and we can really take a hard look at what’s succeeding, fix what
isn’t, and keep moving forward to get to affordable universal healthcare
coverage like you have here in Canada. [Clinton Speech For tinePublic –
Saskatoon, CA, 1/21/15]
No comments:
Post a Comment