This was originally posted on Privacy SOS.
Back in 2012, the ACLU of Massachusetts published
a report called
‘Policing Dissent’, exposing the Boston Police Department’s ‘red squad’
surveillance operations, directed at antiwar and economic justice organizers.
Among the documents we
obtained through a public records lawsuit were so-called ‘intelligence reports’
from the Boston police fusion center, the Boston Regional Intelligence Center
(BRIC). These documents shocked the public. In files labeled “HOMESEC-DOMESTIC”,
“GROUPS-CIVIL DISTURBANCE”, and “GROUPS-EXTREMISTS”, detectives described
the entirely peaceful activities of groups and individuals ranging from
Veterans for Peace and CodePink to Howard Zinn and a former city council
member.
While the BPD files didn’t explicitly call these
non-violent activists ‘terrorists’, detectives working at a so-called ‘counterterrorism
fusion center’ came about as close as they could get to doing so without
spelling out the T word in black and white. But it’s no secret that other law
enforcement agencies jumped that shark long ago. In recent years, undercover
informants have infiltrated antiwar
movements targeted as “domestic terrorists”. While the past decade’s terror
wars have given local, state, and federal law enforcement seemingly endless
funds to pursue activists simply for challenging government policy, the US
government’s conflation of peaceful dissent with terrorism has a long history
in the United States, dating back at least to the 1970s.
Betty Medsger’s new book on the Citizens’ Commission
to Investigate the FBI, “The Burglary”, contains some relevant and largely
suppressed history. In the wake of the Media, PA burglary and the subsequent
newspaper articles exposing J. Edgar Hoover’s red squad surveillance programs,
some CIA officers began to voice dissent internally about their own agency’s
troubling domestic operations, codenamed MHCHAOS. In 1972, Medsger writes, CIA
director Richard Helms
called his top aides together and said he was adamant
that MHCHAOS would not be “stopped simply because some members of the
organization [the CIA] do not like this activity.” He made changes in order to
protect the program more now that the [dissident officers were] so determined
to have it end. To the maximum extent possible, within the agency, the program
and the agent then in charge of it, Richard Ober, would be identified with
terrorism and not with American dissidents. The massive program would in fact
have the same functions it always had, including the monitoring and destruction
of the more than five hundred alternative newspapers staffs it had under
surveillance. (At the same time, the FBI also monitored alternative and campus
newspapers, sometimes suppressing them.)
Henceforth, Colby wrote in a memorandum after that
meeting, the label “international terrorist” would replace “political dissident”
as the target of the CIA’s illegal domestic operations. As part of this image
transformation, Helms did what Hoover had done many times—and would do again in
April 1971 to protect COINTELPRO when he thought it was about to be revealed—to
minimize the possibility that secret operations would be exposed. Helms ended
MHCHAOS in name, but continued it in reality with a new name: International
Terrorism Group. It would be much easier for people, including people within
the CIA, to accept the domestic operations if they thought they were aimed
primarily at stopping terrorism rather than at stopping dissent.
It’s common to hear law enforcement officials
describe non-violent activists as terrorists today. History suggests we can
thank former CIA director Richard Helms for that, at least in part. Years after
his agency’s assassinations, anti-dissent programs, antidemocratic coups, and
other dirty tricks were exposed to the public in congressional hearings during
the 1970s, Helms reportedly said that all of it was “just a congressional
firestorm over nothing,” Medsger writes.
The CIA’s domestic operations offices are
currently based in
Denver, Colorado. Per an executive order signed by Ronald Reagan in 1981, the
CIA is allowed to collect information about Americans. The details of the order
are classified, so we can’t be sure, but it’s a safe bet to assume that if the
agency wants to spy on American dissidents, it just calls them Terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment